Do you agree with Bush about the price of oil and reserves?

White House press secretary states that Bush says


';We don't believe the fill rates have a meaningful impact on oil supplies,';





Agree or disagree?





http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080424/pl_n鈥?/a>Do you agree with Bush about the price of oil and reserves?
The irony is, of course, that 70,000 - 100,000 barrels a day is all that is projected to be produced by ANWAR after 5 years of development, and for years the Administration claimed that was something that needed to happen because with was hugely important.





There are no shortages, so its impact would be in the 10s of cents range per gallon tops, but you have to appreciate the irony of their conflicted positions.





FYI: The first President to actually SELL oil out of the strategic reserve was President George Herbert Walker Bush... during the first Gulf War.





The last time filling was halted?





On April 25, 2006, President Bush announced a temporary halt to petroleum deposits to the SPR as part of a four point program to alleviate high fuel prices... in time for the elections.Do you agree with Bush about the price of oil and reserves?
I don't entirely agree with him, but I also don't agree with Congress. The strategic petroleum reserve is supposed to be for military emergencies.





Bushie tapped it a while ago to lower oil prices before an election. He should have never done that, but now that it's been done, the best thing to do is replenish it and leave it alone.
I agree we need to be ready for an emergency. I have back up supplies such as batteries water etc. The gov. should have our countries needs backed up. I do not think it would make that much of a difference in price at the pump anyway.


That is a typical democrat move of take now and think later.
Disagree, havent found anything that this man says that I agree with.
If the democrats get their way on this it will come back to haunt us.