Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Another 'debate' about Iraq, still no mention of the 114 giga barrels of oil reserves , why is this?

Strange that the first building to be secured in Baghdad was the ministry of pretroleoum. Not only are we being lied to by the arch deceivers Bush and Blair, but the british media still won't tell us the real reason for the occupation of Iraq.





Is the press in the West quite as 'free' as we are led to believe ?Another 'debate' about Iraq, still no mention of the 114 giga barrels of oil reserves , why is this?
Do not you get it? It is an oil war! The west wanted to control the middle east to control the OIL , manipulate the prices (the price of a barrel has tripled since the war with no clear reason) so it becomes difficult for China to get the energy they need to compete with US.


The British media and American media are nothing but a few millionaires who run the show. Most of the British reads ';The SUN';, ';THE MIRROR';, ';DAILY MAIL';...more than 10 millions read this newspapers everyday with an average IQ of 2! the respectable newspapers like ';the independent';, ';the Guardian';...are read by few hundred thousands..the majority of the Americans do not read newspapers or watch news...


The so called western democracy is a BIG lie, there is no difference between BUSH and Saddam (BOTH THUGS) no difference between the prisoners in Guantanamo and Abu Ghreib and those in the time of Saddam. The western media just publish what big guys want. Do not forget the Jewish Lobby who got a hand in each western newspaper (the sun, daily mail...)





I stopped watching British and American news. Try Euronews, DW (German in English) you get the whole facts!Another 'debate' about Iraq, still no mention of the 114 giga barrels of oil reserves , why is this?
but im still wonting to know why is there a oilrig thing on the antrim coast????? there has never been sumthing like that on the west of N.Ireland ever sumbody out there tell us???? is it windmills in the sea or is it oil there looking for
Are you seriously suggesting that the press in the US %26amp; UK take orders from Bush %26amp; Blair? Are you suggesting that nobody has mentioned oil in relation to Iraq? What are you smoking?
Err, does any one know about the 'dossier', Weapons of mass destruction, Chemical factories and Al-qaeda links?? Should Bush and Rumsfield be charged with perjury and telling lies to the whole world and Mr Blair as their accomplice?
Ok, I will help explain stuff for you. They secured the oil, so that the terrorists would not light them on fires again. The reason we do not know why we went into Iraq is because we don't need to know. By telling such, it will only help the terrorists. Oh, we went in there for terrorists, is the best disclosed reason.





We are freer then you think when a radical islam supporter says while in the US, ';The loop hole with the US govt. is that they allow free speech';
Galloway Vs. the U.S.Senate June 2005





';Now, Senator, I gave my heart and soul to oppose the policy that you promoted. I gave my political life's blood to try to stop the mass killing of Iraqis by the sanctions on Iraq which killed one million Iraqis, most of them children, most of them died before they even knew that they were Iraqis, but they died for no other reason other than that they were Iraqis with the misfortune to born at that time. I gave my heart and soul to stop you committing the disaster that you did commit in invading Iraq. And I told the world that your case for the war was a pack of lies.





鈥淚 told the world that Iraq, contrary to your claims did not have weapons of mass destruction. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to al-Qaeda. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that Iraq had no connection to the atrocity on 9/11 2001. I told the world, contrary to your claims, that the Iraqi people would resist a British and American invasion of their country and that the fall of Baghdad would not be the beginning of the end, but merely the end of the beginning.





';Senator, in everything I said about Iraq, I turned out to be right and you turned out to be wrong and 100,000 people paid with their lives; 1600 of them American soldiers sent to their deaths on a pack of lies; 15,000 of them wounded, many of them disabled forever on a pack of lies.





If the world had listened to Kofi Annan, whose dismissal you demanded, if the world had listened to President Chirac who you want to paint as some kind of corrupt traitor, if the world had listened to me and the anti-war movement in Britain, we would not be in the disaster that we are in today. Senator, this is the mother of all smokescreens. You are trying to divert attention from the crimes that you supported, from the theft of billions of dollars of Iraq's wealth.





';Have a look at the real Oil-for-Food scandal. Have a look at the 14 months you were in charge of Baghdad, the first 14 months when $8.8 billion of Iraq's wealth went missing on your watch. Have a look at Halliburton and other American corporations that stole not only Iraq's money, but the money of the American taxpayer.





';Have a look at the oil that you didn't even meter, that you were shipping out of the country and selling, the proceeds of which went who knows where? Have a look at the $800 million you gave to American military commanders to hand out around the country without even counting it or weighing it.





';Have a look at the real scandal breaking in the newspapers today, revealed in the earlier testimony in this committee. That the biggest sanctions busters were not me or Russian politicians or French politicians. The real sanctions busters were your own companies with the connivance of your own Government.';
I'm glad I don't get my information from the same place you do.
';D'; Notice and continual lies!

No comments:

Post a Comment